No products in the cart!
Please make your choice.View all catalog
In fact, most people don’t really have any reason to think about what’s behind their user experience, any more than they care about what’s generating the electrical power that runs lights and appliances inside their house—as Nicholas Carr points out in his book, The Big Switch.
The people who are evaluating Google Workspace for their organization are the ones who do care about what’s under the hood. Google’s infrastructure, of course originally designed for search, is very different from the way in which traditional IT environments are structured. While the term “cloud” is an excellent metaphor for utility computing that’s served up from somewhere out in the ether, Google’s infrastructure is very much terrestrial, and it covers a lot of ground globally.
As a basis of comparison, let’s look at the environment that many Google Workspace customers have come from—Exchange Server. With Exchange Server, each user within an organization typically connects directly to a single physical or virtual box from their Outlook client. There’s usually drive redundancy, such as RAID-10, built into that server (or group of servers) and then the server is in turn, backed up.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with this environment (as long as a proper disaster recovery plan is in place), and Exchange Server is an extremely robust application. However, one perspective on this structure is that all users are connected up to a mother ship—a form of parent/child relationship.
In many ways, Google Workspace is on the complete other end of the spectrum. Users are wired into a very large, global infrastructure and data are widely distributed through Google’s Bigtable database and accompanying file system. When a user sends an email, the write is to a number of different drives that are located in different physical locations—often on different continents.
What does this architecture translate into for practical purposes?
This architecture allows Google to guarantee 99.9% uptime for Google Workspace. As we all know, for email, users’ downtime tolerance thresholds are very low. Email downtime can be very costly depending upon when it happens.
All Google Apps customers are on one, very large instance of Google’s application. This makes for significant economies of scale in terms of sharing physical resources. In addition, Google has designed their data centers around inexpensive, commodity hardware and free software — which makes their incremental expansion costs relatively inexpensive. This allows Google to charge only $6 per user per month for the entry level edition of Google Workspace.
The single, multi-tenant instance also means that upgrades are frequent and transparent, compared to event-based upgrades in a legacy environment. Customers don’t have to pay anything extra for upgrades—they just happen in background. Innovation occurs very quickly and newly released innovations are usable immediately.
Google Sites, which is part of Google Workspace, can take the place of a wiki. For example a Google Site can be used to collaborate on a project or on a set of best practices. Google continues to enhance the more traditional document, spreadsheet and presentation categories—these are also highly collaborative in nature.
Google Workspace’s marketplace offers a variety of business productivity add-ons, some of which leverage the GMail Contextual Gadget capabilities. Google Workspace customers can get incremental business value with just a few clicks.
Google’s unique, flat, global architecture represents a significant shift in thinking for many IT professionals and corporate decision makers. Each day, thousands of organizations are embracing this new approach to corporate email and collaboration—and it’s still relatively early in the game.